![]() A good correspondence between the experimental and theoretical results supports the suggestion that perceptual positional biases associated with the context‑evoked increase in neural excitation may be one of the main causes of the continuously filled‑space illusion. The results of experiments using vertical shifts of distractors supported the model’s assumption regarding the two‑dimensional Gaussian profile of hypothetical areas of weighted spatial summation of neural activity. In the case of two distractors arranged symmetrically with respect to the lateral terminator, we found that the magnitude of the illusion is approximately equal to the sum of the relevant values obtained with separate distractors. Our experiments confirm that the illusion manifests itself along a distracting segment located both inside and outside of the reference interval. The present study aimed to further develop our computational model of the continuously filled‑space illusion and to examine whether the model predictions successfully account for illusory effects caused by distracting line‑segments of various lengths that are attached to different endpoints (i.e., terminators) of the reference spatial interval of the three‑dot stimulus. Although the continuously filled‑space illusion has been systematically studied for over a century, there is still no generally accepted explanation of its origin. This illusion of interrupted spatial extent is also known as the 'filled‑space’ or ‘Oppel‑Kundt’ illusion. For most observers, the part of the stimulus that is filled with some visual elements (e.g., distractors) appears larger than the unfilled part of the same size.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |