especially given how long they have been in the game now. If it really is a learning product, then why is there so much legit activity stopped. We are currently under going the on boarding process with this product, but the amount of legit activity it stops is mind boggling. We have a layered approach and it is solid, and I also understand that no product is 100 percent at catching the nasty stuff. I am hoping to get some peoples real world experience with the product. The questionable information I have seen from them, and what I read online is what has me concerned. I feel like it is a great product to prevent me from working. then hit every shady infected website you can to see if it really does what it says it does. other than the sales demo, have any of you REALLY tested this product?īasically, has anyone ever taken a system with Cylance installed, remove it from network, go on the internet. It also shows the dependency of the other products on regular updates, cloud queries or dynamic behavioral detection.īest Protection Against Unknown Threats – The tests have shown that CylancePROTECT is able to detect and prevent unknown attacks, while the other vendors are still struggling to prevent new malware from executing.I am curious what your experience with the CylancePROTECT product is. All three of AV-TEST’s protection test cases showed that CylancePROTECT has a very reliable approach that works offline, without the need for regular updates, even before execution of the malware. Some companies may not deploy updates regularly, and users are often using non-updated machines with outdated signature databases. No Updates = Performance Advantage – Unlike traditional AV offerings, Cylance requires no back-end updates giving it a real-world performance advantage. Cylance fared even better against competing products in offline environments, where it was more than three times as effective as the average of the other products tested. The second best product only detected 67 percent with an average across the five AV products of 42 percent. Highest Efficacy Against All Environments – CylancePROTECT was more than twice as effective as the average AV software in preventing threats before execution, stopping more than 97 percent of the malware samples. And though we are thrilled with the results of AV-TEST’s independent study, it doesn’t change our advice for every company in the world when thinking about deploying new security software – test for yourselves.”ĬylancePROTECT’s performance in the AV-TEST comparison beat the average performance of legacy antivirus across every single test. “We’re hoping that this test will show other testing organizations that any comparison that allows vendors to know which threats are being used in advance is not representative of the challenge that enterprises face every single day in protecting their systems, their employees and their customers. “This is one of the first times that a major security testing house has employed testing criteria that mimic the real world where truly unknown threats attack endpoints in both a connected and disconnected environment,” said Chad Skipper, VP of industry relations and product testing at Cylance. In all test cases, CylancePROTECT showed extremely high prevention rates. AV-TEST proved Cylance’s approach sets it apart from all industry competition when it comes to effectiveness in preventing malware from executing. There were several real-life scenarios against which AV-TEST evaluated CylancePROTECT: systems that had delayed updates, false positives, simulated attacks and malware that had been distributed by websites. “This is the first time we tested the ‘marketing claims’ of a next-gen vendor and results showed that the claims are indeed backed up by the technology,” said Maik Morgenstern, CTO and CEO of AV-TEST. The study measures each product’s individual performance against new and unknown malicious executables in both connected and disconnected environments. The primary goal of the study was to measure the detection and prevention capabilities of traditional antivirus software against the next-generation approach of Cylance. The testing methodology was developed to provide additive testing to the commodity antivirus protection tests currently produced by AV-TEST.ĭuring the study, Cylance’s artificial intelligence-based product CylancePROTECT® was tested against five legacy, signature-based endpoint security products from Kaspersky, McAfee, Sophos, Symantec and Trend Micro. Cylance® Inc., the company replacing antivirus with AI-powered prevention blocking everyday malware along with the most advanced cyber threats available, announced today the results of an AV-TEST study that measured the advanced threat-prevention capabilities of leading enterprise endpoint protection software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |